Graham,
Thank you for your reply.
>
> Unfortunately we are quite late in the Merlin cycle and
> we can't really accommodate major API changes at this point.
I don't consider that a valid excuse for rushing out an api which isn't
as
good as it could be.
> However, I will be studying Ceki's comments carefully.
>
I am pleased that you will look at the comments, and I hope that action
to
improve the logging api for JDK 1.4 will result. Even if that means delay
in
the process.
Regards,
Emily Bache