Delivered-To: cgu@qos.ch
From: "Chandra Patni" <chandra.patni@oracle.com>
To: <java-logging-input@eng.sun.com>
Cc: <cgu@qos.ch>
Subject: Bringing log4j as logging facility
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:01:23 -0700
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal

After reading JSR47 vs. log4j note by Ceki Gülcü
http://jakarta.apache.org/log4j/docs/critique.html, I persoanally feel that
log4j features should be considered for the logger API. There is nothing
wrong in revising log4j as standard API for Java platform. Afterall, JDOM is
accepted as JSR although it's an alternate to other parsing API. For me, I
just can't see happen that there is another competing API in another
namespace than java/javax which is better, richer and faster than standard
API.

Regards,
Chandra Patni
Software Engineer, Oracle Corp

Disclaimer: The statements and opinions expressed here are my own
and do not necessarily represent those of Oracle Corporation.